Forum Settings
       
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

you was waiting for meFollow

#27 Sep 16 2008 at 10:01 AM Rating: Default
Quote:
Quote:
i don't know when you post the LS warning or not.
but take a look on it.
http://ffxi.allakhazam.com/forum.html...m=56;page=1

You started "attacking" us first:

We posted it July 30th, when our zone was taken and we were almost screwed out of doing dynamis entirely. We politely informed the an officer of the linkshell abotu the calendar, and we were told to f*** off. We aren't the only ones this happened to, nor was it the first time. This was the 3rd time it had happened to us by you guys when we decided to post this. It wasn't badmouthing anyone in particular, aside form Lionze, but it was a general warnin to other linkshells to be wary of their zones.


ok, that is ok.
but how many of us (the ones that appear on the list)send you to **** off?
2 ppl, 3ppl? there are more than 50 ppl on these list and some of then dont know nothing about this... and they continue on these list..

thats the reason because some of us come here and starting to be rude.. cause you started before..

maybe the first step we have to do is to delete/edit this blame by both parts..

#28 Sep 16 2008 at 11:26 AM Rating: Default
It's true that nearly everyone of us, didn't know about that post, and maybe Lionze thought that it wans't "important" because isn't any oficial thing of SE. I don't know, really.

What albertomagno said it's true too. Maybe the ones to start being rude were you, but it's true that, If u posted this at July's 30th, it's normal to start being rude, with all the time that has passed, and anything changed.

For my part, again, want to ask you to remove or edit the LS member list, because nearly no one knows what heppens, and If they do, they are not able to do anything. I repeat that, If u don't want to erase it, just put my name and Lionze in it, as de main culprits (culprit is correct?) of it.

I told you that we will try to get a solution, and we are doing it. We are trying to know where the American people of our LS can start Wednesday's Dynamis, to try to start it a little earlier, because it's not possible to start it more late, cuz the different time zone.

I just beg a little more of patience from your part, while we are able to handle this.

Edited, Sep 16th 2008 3:23pm by YUGON
#29 Sep 16 2008 at 11:34 AM Rating: Excellent
*
73 posts
Neither I or w00t posted the list of members, you have to contact bummage for that.
#30 Sep 16 2008 at 12:08 PM Rating: Default
Ok Thank you.

Is he aware of all what is happening in this post??
#31 Sep 17 2008 at 3:34 PM Rating: Good
**
436 posts
YUGON wrote:
Ok Thank you.

Is he aware of all what is happening in this post??


Bummage has in fact, named himself a member of your linkshell, hence his ability to get your member roster. He just hasn't said which member he is.
#32 Sep 17 2008 at 11:15 PM Rating: Default
vassarAK wrote:

Bummage has in fact, named himself a member of your linkshell, hence his ability to get your member roster. He just hasn't said which member he is.


Okay

A little white lie, I admit. BUT...done for a very specific reason. StarsMaker had "issues" tonight. They didn't do Dynamis at all, just as planned. :)


vassarAK wrote:

Hushigoshi
MNK75 :: BLM75 :: WAR75 :: THF75 :: RDM75 :: NIN75 :: BRD75


PROOF 75 RDM
#33 Sep 18 2008 at 3:15 AM Rating: Default
Bummage wrote:
A little white lie, I admit. BUT...done for a very specific reason. StarsMaker had "issues" tonight. They didn't do Dynamis at all, just as planned. :)


That's a load of crap. You really must be full of yourself if you think you're the sole reason the run didn't go through.

And you're a liar. So, what right do you have to stake claims of superior conduct on any ground. Of course, far be it from you to give a flip about not being two-faced.

Edited, Sep 18th 2008 6:11am by Jereth
#34 Sep 18 2008 at 3:38 AM Rating: Default
Bummage wrote:
vassarAK wrote:

Bummage has in fact, named himself a member of your linkshell, hence his ability to get your member roster. He just hasn't said which member he is.


Okay

A little white lie, I admit. BUT...done for a very specific reason. StarsMaker had "issues" tonight. They didn't do Dynamis at all, just as planned. :)



This prove that you are a lier, and all your posts are full of lies.

And no, we didn't do dynamis, but not cause your "plan".. some of us know who are really you in game.
it was because our members that need sandy can't assist yesterday and SoramimiCake ask us very courtesy if we can leave beaucedine for them, and we did it.

And if the leader and the sacks decide to follow the calendar will be thanks to people like SoramimiCake, not thanks to childs like like you.

#35 Sep 18 2008 at 6:59 AM Rating: Decent
Jereth wrote:

That's a load of crap. You really must be full of yourself if you think you're the sole reason the run didn't go through.


Keep telling yourself that. You might actually convince yourself eventually. :D

Jereth wrote:

And you're a liar. So, what right do you have to stake claims of superior conduct on any ground. Of course, far be it from you to give a flip about not being two-faced.


Did I ever make any claims of superiority? Not a one.

Basically it comes down to this. When you decide to **** off other members of the community, they're gonna work to do the same back. Perhaps it's right, perhaps it's wrong. That is irrelevant. I see it got the point across though, and you've decided to start using the calender. I'd call that a success, and the ends justify the means.
#36 Sep 18 2008 at 7:07 AM Rating: Default
AlbertoMagno wrote:

This prove that you are a lier, and all your posts are full of lies.


No, not completely. It proves that you're easy to manipulate. It didn't even prove to be that much of a challenge. And it succeeded in getting your linkshell to use the calender

AlbertoMagno wrote:

And no, we didn't do dynamis, but not cause your "plan".. some of us know who are really you in game.


Now you sir are the liar. You know who I am? State my name, or stfu.

AlbertoMagno wrote:

it was because our members that need sandy can't assist yesterday and SoramimiCake ask us very courtesy if we can leave beaucedine for them, and we did it.


Several members of other linkshells have asked you courteously in the past if you would refrain from stealing a zone. You never backed down before. No, it took these threads in this forum to get you tards to see we mean business.

AlbertoMagno wrote:

And if the leader and the sacks decide to follow the calendar will be thanks to people like SoramimiCake, not thanks to childs like like you.


I cannot discount Bethy's input in all this. By nature she is a voice of common sense and reason, and she has been very wise in all of this. :)
#37 Sep 18 2008 at 1:02 PM Rating: Default
Bummage wrote:
Jereth wrote:

That's a load of crap. You really must be full of yourself if you think you're the sole reason the run didn't go through.


Keep telling yourself that. You might actually convince yourself eventually. :D


Keep telling yourself that. You might actually convince yourself eventually. :D

Bummage wrote:
Basically it comes down to this. When you decide to **** off other members of the community, they're gonna work to do the same back. Perhaps it's right, perhaps it's wrong. That is irrelevant. I see it got the point across though, and you've decided to start using the calender. I'd call that a success, and the ends justify the means.


And, yet we have more honor than you. And, the ends to not justify the means. And, it's people like Bethany and Icefloe that did this NOT YOU. Get that through your thick skull. All you managed to do is let the mature people know you are anything but.

And of course, you accuse me of lying and it's a huge ordeal. I point out your lies and it's just "sticks and stones" to you. Typical.

Edited, Sep 18th 2008 4:05pm by Jereth
#38 Sep 18 2008 at 1:03 PM Rating: Default
Bummage wrote:
Now you sir are the liar. You know who I am? State my name, or stfu.


But we all have a long way to go to catch up with your lies. You know who I am? That's right you do because NONE of us are cowards like yourself.
#39 Sep 19 2008 at 8:17 AM Rating: Decent
Jereth wrote:

And, yet we have more honor than you.


There is no honor in racism. No doubt your linkshell has made a step in the right direction by agreeing to cooperate with others, but it wasn't voluntary. It took a few threads and some rolling around in the mud to get you to do what we needed you to do.

I am a pixelated name on a message board. I have no honor. I don't need any. People know who you are in-game, and they know who your fellow linkshell members are. While I'm sure they are relieved to know you have been forced to cooperate, that is a far cry from being able to claim honor. People are still going to be wary of your actions, they're not going to trust you right off. That will take time. Just make sure to keep your nose clean, and things will get better for you and your fellow shell mates.

Jereth wrote:

And, the ends to not justify the means.


And you refer to me as childish? Nearly every comment I make you feel the need to state the opposite. "Yes it is...no it isn't...yes it is...etc." From my experience, people tend to accuse others of that which they themselves are guilty, or that which they fear being accused of. So you can refer to me being childish all you want. It doesn't matter to me, yet it speaks volumes on your behaviors...and fears.

Jereth wrote:

Get that through your thick skull.


...sticks and stones...

Jereth wrote:

All you managed to do is let the mature people know you are anything but.


I don't think I could possibly care less of what others think, but you apparently do. The ends justify the means. Your linkshell will now cooperate and use the calender. That's all that matters to me. ;)

Jereth wrote:

And of course, you accuse me of lying and it's a huge ordeal. I point out your lies and it's just "sticks and stones" to you. Typical.


The "sticks and stones" comments were made after the multitude of name-calling remarks. That does seem to be the apex of your debating skills, or lack thereof. You show no sense of logic. Each time you have disagreed with someone, you have proceeded to call them names instead of providing support to why you disagree.
#40 Sep 19 2008 at 10:34 AM Rating: Decent
Bummage wrote:
There is no honor in racism. No doubt your linkshell has made a step in the right direction by agreeing to cooperate with others, but it wasn't voluntary. It took a few threads and some rolling around in the mud to get you to do what we needed you to do.


We as in a linkshell, and most people on that shell aren't racist. That's why I said WE. Look it up. It's a plural. Thus WE have more honor than YOU.

Bummage wrote:
I am a pixelated name on a message board. I have no honor. I don't need any.


We are still people. This is a means of communication very much like a phone. I suppose you don't need honor on the phone either? And, you do need it. You just lack it and therefore down play it as usual.

Bummage wrote:
And you refer to me as childish? Nearly every comment I make you feel the need to state the opposite. "Yes it is...no it isn't...yes it is...etc."


Which is odd as the yes/no war was started by you. I suggest you read this thread this time.

Bummage wrote:
"Yes it is...no it isn't...yes it is...etc." From my experience, people tend to accuse others of that which they themselves are guilty, or that which they fear being accused of. So you can refer to me being childish all you want. It doesn't matter to me, yet it speaks volumes on your behaviors...and fears.


Mine too, and this would also explain why you made the accusations first. I'll give you one example since we know how your memory works. I'm the liar remember?

Bummage wrote:
You show no sense of logic. Each time you have disagreed with someone, you have proceeded to call them names instead of providing support to why you disagree.


Don't pull a 180 now. I suppose you don't name call either, and these posts you made are from someone else. There goes the hypocritical side of you again. And, of course you rehash while I reiterate to get the point across you never got in the first place. I'm afraid serving you a point though is much like trying to stuff a q-tip through concrete; it ain't gonna happen.

Edited, Sep 19th 2008 1:33pm by Jereth
#41 Sep 19 2008 at 12:31 PM Rating: Default
Jereth wrote:

We as in a linkshell, and most people on that shell aren't racist. That's why I said WE. Look it up. It's a plural. Thus WE have more honor than YOU.


Most are not racist? Just certain ones? lol...whether it is all or one doesn't matter. The leader is a racist pig, and any members who choose to follow him are approving of his ways...including you. Again, there is no honor in racism.

Jereth wrote:

We are still people. This is a means of communication very much like a phone. I suppose you don't need honor on the phone either? And, you do need it. You just lack it and therefore down play it as usual.


Posting messages in a forum is the same as talking on a phone? Are you serious? ROTF! Either way, you wouldn't know honor if it came up and bit you on your butt. You have no honor, you don't understand the meaning of the word.

Jereth wrote:

Which is odd as the yes/no war was started by you.


What yes/no war? That isn't what this debate is about. It's about your linkshell stealing zones from others, and the disgusting behavior by you and your leader in response to it. How is that a yes/no war?

Jereth wrote:

Mine too, and this would also explain why you made the accusations first. I'll give you one example since we know how your memory works. I'm the liar remember?


LOL! Another lame tactic. When someone makes a valid point, and then backs it up you give the typical illogical reply..."I didn't do it...you did it." Please, at least be a little more creative in your attempts to debate.

Jereth wrote:
Don't pull a 180 now.


Have I stated that I've changed my mind on something? That is what doing a 180 refers to. Come on Mule, if you are going to throw in cliches at least do it in the proper context.

Jereth wrote:
I suppose you don't name call either.


Oh, I most certainly do. Now let me explain why your reading comprehension shows a lack of skill. The difference is that I reply and give reasons why I say what I say, I don't sit there and call names for the sake of it. You do. You use name calling to reply to valid points, ignoring the point and diverting the topic in a different direction since you clearly don't have the debating skills to tackle the point. Ad hominem as it is best exemplified by you.

Jereth wrote:
And, of course you rehash while I reiterate to get the point across you never got in the first place. I'm afraid serving you a point though is much like trying to stuff a q-tip through concrete; it ain't gonna happen.


Okay, in the first sentence of that comment you state you are going to reiterate a point that I never got in the first place. Well, what is it? The following sentence merely supports the first by stating a point is about to be given, yet no point is ever expressed. And that was the end of your reply...so what is this point that you claim I never got?
1 2 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 11 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (11)